In the long history of music biopics, no film is as unsettling, controversial, or strangely unforgettable as Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story. Shot in 1987 by a then-unknown Todd Haynes, the low-budget art film tells the life story of Karen Carpenter — using Barbie dolls.
Yes. Barbie dolls.
And that’s only the beginning of why the film has become one of the most infamous banned music films ever made.
A Pop Tragedy Told Through Plastic
Superstar chronicles Karen Carpenter’s rise to fame with The Carpenters, her struggles with anorexia nervosa, and her tragic death in 1983 at the age of 32. Instead of actors, Haynes used Barbie dolls for Karen and Ken dolls for her brother Richard Carpenter, staging scenes of television appearances, recording sessions, and private family moments.
The choice wasn’t meant to be whimsical. It was deeply symbolic.
The stiff, idealized bodies of the dolls were meant to reflect the impossible beauty standards Karen was trapped inside — a plastic perfection that mirrored the expectations placed on her by fame, media, and the music industry. As Karen’s illness worsens in the film, Haynes literally shaves down the Barbie doll’s body, making her thinner and thinner until it becomes disturbing to watch.
It’s not subtle. And it’s not meant to be.
Why the Film Was Banned
Despite critical admiration in underground film circles, Superstar was never officially released. The Carpenter family objected strongly to the film, citing both unauthorized use of Karen’s image and extensive use of Carpenters songs without permission.
Legal action followed, and the film was effectively suppressed, banned from commercial distribution and festivals. Today, it survives only through bootleg copies passed around online and in academic film studies.
Ironically, that ban only strengthened the film’s reputation.
Art, Exploitation, or Both?
The debate around Superstar has never ended.
Some view it as exploitative — an invasive, unauthorized portrait of a woman who suffered deeply and privately. Others see it as one of the most compassionate and radical portrayals of eating disorders ever put on film, especially at a time when anorexia was rarely discussed openly.
Unlike glossy music biopics that celebrate triumph, Superstar is bleak, clinical, and deliberately uncomfortable. It offers no redemption arc, no soaring finale — only the quiet devastation of watching someone disappear under the weight of expectation.
Why It Still Matters
Nearly four decades later, the film remains shockingly relevant. Conversations about body image, celebrity pressure, and mental health — especially for women in entertainment — are more visible than ever. Superstar feels less like a curiosity and more like a warning that arrived too early.
It’s also a strange footnote in the legacy of Karen Carpenter, whose voice remains one of the most beloved in pop music history. The contrast between her warm, human sound and the cold plastic imagery of the film is precisely what makes it so haunting.
The Weirdest Music Movie Ever Made?
By conventional standards — absolutely.
A banned biopic.
Played by dolls.
Directed by a future Oscar-nominated filmmaker.
Feared by an industry that didn’t yet know how to talk about eating disorders.
Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story isn’t easy to watch, and it was never meant to be. But weird or not, it occupies a singular place in music and film history — one that refuses to be forgotten, no matter how hard it was buried.
And maybe that, more than anything, is why it still matters.
cuong